However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 19, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act by the Daegu District Court.

On November 17, 2019, at around 19:22, the Defendant driven a fluent car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 1.5 km from the front road in Daegu Northern-gu B to the front parking lot in the same Gu D Building E-dong.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Written appraisal request, report on blood alcohol concentration, and written appraisal on blood alcohol concentration;

1. A statement on criminal records, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (verification of the same criminal history as a suspect);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing conditions of the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances:

- The fact that there is a history of punishment for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) - the recognition and reflect of the crime, and the refusal to drive under the influence of alcohol again;