beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.05.20 2019나25839

손해배상(의)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding or adding as mentioned below 2, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A part concerning addition or height;

(a) remove “emergency room” in Section 15 of the judgment of the first instance;

(b)Nos. 6 to 8 of the first instance judgment shall be followed by the following:

"In the absence of dispute", "A evidence Nos. 1, 3-1 through 5, and 5-1 through 6 of the evidence No. 5, the video No. 4 of the first instance court, the result of the commission of the examination of medical records to the head of the F Hospital of the first instance court, the result of the commission of the examination of medical records to the head of the F Hospital of the first instance court, the purport of all pleadings"

(c) Nos. 15 and 16 of the judgment of the first instance court (3), on the 15th and 16th part of the judgment of the first instance (3rd, the third balance was not implemented; the fourth balance was not implemented; the third, fourth balance was not implemented; the third, fourth balance was not implemented; the same was not implemented; and the same was applied to the third, fourth balance was not implemented.”

Part 8 of the decision of the court of first instance shall be referred to as "the court of first instance".

(e)as follows, letter 6, 2, and 5 of the first instance judgment shall be followed:

“In light of the fact that Defendant B was negligent in clearly omitting the beer, beer, and he was at fault in the course of the instant operation, and that the Plaintiff’s 2, 3, and 4 resin, which are similar to Defendant B’s damaged parts, were operated in a lump sum, and that only the 2, 3, and 4 resin was written in detail, and that it is difficult to conclude that Defendant B caused the Plaintiff’s collapse of 2, 3, and 4 resin.”

(f) in Part 6, Section 7, of the first instance court ruling, the term “this Court” shall be applied to “the court of first instance”.

(g)as of the sixthth sentence of the first instance court, the following shall be added:

In addition, blood supply is not smooth in the second, third, and fourth balance of the Plaintiff.