When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the office of the branch of the Association, south-gu branch of the building in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, the second floor D, and (b) at the victim G, who works as the representative of the (g)F representative, did not receive or embezzled the money by using the deaf and female in Ulsan-gu; (b) at the place of H, I, and J, “G was taken by receiving the payment of KRW 600,000 per month from H, K, and L, and embezzled KRW 80,000,000 by using the deaf and female in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (c) thereby impairing the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of witness I and H;

1. G’s statement statement (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no fact that the defendant made the statement as stated in the facts charged, but the defendant directly viewed that the defendant made theization of the statement as stated in his/her reasoning at the site of this case.

of the witness I, H's investigative agency, and the statements in this court are very reliable.

As such, it is recognized that the facts charged are fully convicted

1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Articles 11 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate deaf-mutes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;