beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.07.19 2018고정2355

명예훼손등

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, from October 2012 to August 2013, operated the purification tank cleaning business with the trade name “C” in Incheon District, and the victim “C”, “D” operated by the victim “F”, “H” operated by the victim G, “J” operated by the victim I, “L” operated by the victim K, and “N” operated by the victim M are the cleaning business entity permitted by the head of the respective B.

In March 27, 2018, the Defendant, even though there was no fact that victims have charged for cleaning fees for cleaning in the vicinity of the BB office, etc. around the Incheon O, the Defendant abused the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts by using a loudspeaker at the place where many and unspecified people pass and hear, including, but not limited to, an illegal claim for cleaning expenses for cleaning excreta, an illegal act such as deception, gys disposal of excreta, and an illegal business through collusion, etc., during the cleaning of excreta, the Defendant: “B office,” “B office,” “B office,” “The government office,” “The government office,” “The government office,” “The government office, having claimed to charge the purification fees to the Gu residents, the government agency which has forged the certificate of measurement,” “The government office,” “I have been subject to the fraud of the cleaning fees for various subcommittees,” and “I have been subject to the fraud of the cleaning fees for cleaning.”

B. On February 15, 2018, the Defendant is aware of the fact that the head of “B” has to protect the residents’ livelihood even though he/she committed an unlawful act, such as providing preferential treatment to the Defendant’s Facebook (P), aiding and abetting the illegal act, etc. under the negligence of duties, such as requesting the agency’s cleaning expenses through the cleaning agent’s cleaning costs, conducting cleaning performance report, and illegal business through collusion, etc., with the aim of slandering the victims.