, however, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

At around November 8, 2016, the Defendant’s house located in the Namwon-si building and the Defendant’s house located in the 103th day, and after having access to the Internet Twitter (tWter.com) site to ID and then called “E”, the Defendant’s line line on the road of “E”, animation and the appearing material of this documentary “E”, which were sold on April 2017, and carried out the construction section (joint purchase) of the “E” (the trademark of a small plastic scopic scopic, a small plastic scopic, produced by the Twitter, a manufacturer, in Japan).

The phrase “” posted a letter, and the victim F, who had contacted with Twitter Messen, made a false statement to the effect that “I will immediately deposit the price of the goods in the Nong account known to the third party, and send the back to the road, if the delivery cost of the applied goods is separately deposited after approximately 5 to 6 months, and the delivery cost of the applied goods is separately deposited.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he would use the price of goods received from the injured party for the purpose of living expenses and personal debt repayment, etc., so even if he receives the price of goods and delivery expenses, he delivered to the injured party and sent the road back

there was no intention or ability to act.

The Defendant, at around 16:49 of the same day and received KRW 42,50,00 from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account (G) under the name of the Defendant’s name, as well as from the time to August 19, 2017, by deceiving the victims by such means as above, and received KRW 22,776,830 in total from 173 victims over 510 times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each authentic document, written statement, each statement of deposit transactions, each document of confirmation of each transfer, each statement of conversation, each statement of conversation, and an official announcement letter of closure;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of fraud)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Act).