상해
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the director of the remodeling project site in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Association B.
At around 16:05 on June 20, 2018, the Defendant, on the second floor of the above construction site, assaulted the victim by spiting the victim's face.
Summary of Evidence
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness D, E, and F’s statutory statement or partial statutory statement;
1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order
1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is the date and time indicated in the facts charged in the judgment of the Defendant, and the victim’s flab and flab at the place where the Defendant committed assault, such as flabing the flab, making it difficult to know the number of treatment days.
2. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be said to have been proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the Defendant inflicted an injury, such as satisfeing and flafing the victim’s bat, etc., by causing violence, such as flafing the victim’s bat as indicated in the facts charged.
Although the victim D made a statement to the effect that the Defendant was satisfed by having his bridged, it is difficult to believe that D’s statement was made to the investigative agency as is, since the Defendant appeared as a witness in this court, and at the time, testified to the effect that the Defendant was not satisfed with his dubial, and that there was an exaggeration to protect himself at the time of making a statement at the investigative agency.
B. Although the witness G made a statement to the effect that the defendant was pushedly and pushed down with the victim D from the investigative agency to this court, the victim D and others.