대여금
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. On July 2, 2007, Defendant C and E requested the Plaintiffs to provide a loan necessary to purchase the F’s share in the driving range of the inner high school owned by Defendant C, E, and F.
Accordingly, on July 2, 2007, Plaintiff A transferred KRW 100 million to the Industrial Bank of Korea account in the name of Defendant D (Defendant C’s wife), which was known by Defendant C on July 2, 2007, and Plaintiff B transferred KRW 250 million to the Industrial Bank of Korea account in the name of Defendant D on the same day (including Plaintiff A’s funds of KRW 37.5 million and KRW 137.5 million to Plaintiff B’s funds).
Therefore, the Plaintiffs lent KRW 137.5 million to the Defendant.
2. The reasoning of the judgment below and evidence Nos. 1 and 2 are insufficient to acknowledge that the plaintiffs lent KRW 137.5 million to the defendants as alleged by the plaintiffs, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the above assertion by the plaintiffs is without merit.
3. Thus, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants of this case are all dismissed as there is no ground. It is so decided as per Disposition.