A Imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of No. 2 and No. 3 of the judgment of the court below for a crime of No. 1 of the judgment of the court below, 2 years.

[Criminal Justice] On October 15, 2009, Defendant A was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on June 22, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 29, 2010. Defendant B was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court on August 19, 2010, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 27th of the same month.

[Criminal facts against Defendant 2013 Highest 2489]

1. The Defendants: (a) have access to the victimJ to use it for the payment of the capital increase in G, H, and nameless boxes; (b) have been gathered in order to acquire money by means of borrowing the capital increase after the capital increase; and (c) after the capital increase, H had the victim borrowed money by means of collecting the funds from the victim following the capital increase; (d) Defendant B, the representative director of Defendant A and I Co., Ltd., who belongs to the so-called legal team, recommended the relevant organization to submit the documents for the capital increase, directly submit the documents for the capital increase to the relevant organization; (e) have the victim to prepare the passbook to use for the crime; and (e) have the head of the Tong to report the loss or loss of the corporate passbook; and (e) the computer team that belongs to the bearer of name insolvency, if the capital increase has been paid, has been distributed through the Internet banking to all other accounts; and (e) has been engaged in the withdrawal work, and (e) has been divided into two separate accounts and deducted each other.

On January 2, 2008, Defendant B stated that “I will increase the capital of the corporation” to the victim in the LA certified judicial scrivener office located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul. If 30 million won is loaned due to the shortage of funds, Defendant B would provide 3,600,000 won in return.”

그러나 사실은 피해자가 300,000,000원을 증자대금으로 교부받더라도 위와 같이 피해자로부터 받은 증자대금을 가로챌 생각이었을...