위증
The defendant shall be innocent.
The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) from February 1998 to December 2, 1998, the Defendant was working as the captain of the 7th Army Education Team in the Army; (b) observed D who was admitted to the said new illness Education Team in November 27, 1998 as a new illness on November 27, 1998; and (c) prepared a commander’s written opinion about D; and (d) immediately after D was admitted to the new illness Education Team, D was found to have been detained by the Defendant, who was the captain, and was found to be above the spirit of the interview, and was hospitalized to the hospital.
However, at around 14:00 on July 18, 2013, the Defendant asked the Gwangju High Court of Gwangju, 2013Nu412 to be present and take an oath as a witness of the action to revoke the refusal of persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State, and then the Plaintiff’s legal representative before the trial division in the above case asked “it is necessary that the above commander’s written opinion will be prepared by the witness at the time of the trial division,” “I do not know the process of the preparation of the above commander’s opinion, which is similar to the signature of the witness, but the signature of the witness will not be written.” The presiding judge asked “I will sign the witness’s name next to the witness’s name but the signature may not be written differently according to the body of body at that time.” The signature of the witness should return to the commander two times, the above commander’s written opinion was prepared, “I will not answer the witness’s usual opinion,” and it is not the Plaintiff’s legal representative to answer the questions at once.”