However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Acquisition of stolen property;

A. On May 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 03:00 on May 8, 2014, the Defendant sent a signal with a view to purchasing a lost smartphone against the taxi engineers on the street front of the 206 206 alternative securities flat line as the former citizen; (b) shaking smartphone light; and (c) found a non-existent male taxi engineer was carrying on the side-way the numberless taxi that he/she operated.

The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, acquired the loss of the victim C, who was a passenger, from the above taxi engineer, and purchased 360,000 won with knowledge of the fact that one cost of gallon 3 smartphone 1,00,000 won owned by the above C was a stolen property, and acquired the stolen property.

B. On May 10, 2014, the Defendant, at around 03:20 on May 10, 2014, sent a signal to a taxi driver by the same method against the taxi engineer at the place under the preceding paragraph, and sent the signal to the taxi driver by means of the same manner, and the discovered DNA driver E was carrying out the F-business taxi he operated on the side.

The Defendant, at the same time and place, found the loss of the Victim G, who was a passenger, from the above E, and purchased 90,000 won, even though he did not return to the victim, and acquired the stolen goods by purchasing 90,000 won, even though he knew that 1 price of the above G-owned smartphone was 80,000 won.

2. At around 02:30 on May 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) knew of the purchase of the said smartphone 3 smartphone, which had not been returned to one of the non-victims lost by the victim, who is a passenger by friendship H at the place under the preceding paragraph; and (b) received a request from the said H to sell and request the purchase of the said smartphone; (c) on the same day, the Defendant arranged the transfer of the stolen goods by receiving KRW 360,000 from the above I within the J K5 car operated by the said I on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1..