[criminal history] On October 11, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on April 18, 201, the same court issued a fine of KRW 2.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving).

[Criminal facts]

1. On 31. 31. 31. 22:39, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driven CM5 vehicles at the CM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol leveling from approximately 100 meters to the 100-meter section in front of the chill road located in the 325-lane of the said chill road, from the front of an influent restaurant near the chill road in the upper fluence of the road at around 325:169.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol by violating it again.

2. As the Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, at the same time and place as that of paragraph 1, was under the influence of drinking from E in the wave police station D, he tried to forge a written statement report on the driver’s circumstances in the name of F.

Accordingly, the Defendant responded to the above E with personal information, notified the F’s resident registration number of “F,” and stated F’s personal information in the situation report of the driver’s statement, and signed the instant driver’s statement report on the situation of the driver’s driver’s statement in the manner of the driver’s statement.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of a statement report on the circumstances of the driver in the name of F, which is a private document on proof of facts.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 2, submitted to E a written report on the circumstances of the driver at the State who was forged, as set forth in paragraph 2, and submitted it to E in the circumstances where he/she knew of such fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the circumstances of driving at home, a report on the circumstances of the driver at home.