However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 14, 2015, the Defendant had a dispute with the victim D (the age of 57) in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Goyang-si on August 02:0, 2015, and the Defendant had the victim's marith with the victim D (the age of 57).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Application of field photographs and statutes on suspect photographs;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that the degree of injury on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act does not be somewhat weak and that there are many kinds of records punished as the same or similar power in the past is disadvantageous.

However, there are some circumstances to consider the background of the crime in this case, and the victim is not punished against the defendant, and the execution shall be postponed considering the gender, age, level of education, occupation and economic condition of the defendant.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.