If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

In collaboration with B, on June 29, 2012, the Defendant suffered injury, such as an unfashion in need of treatment for about four weeks, when the Defendant took the fash belt of the victim E (the age of 48), and the Defendant took the fash belt of the victim E (the age of 48) with left hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 2 (1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment of Violences, etc., Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim of the crime, such as “Dhop” in the “Dhop house” located in Sungsung-si on June 29, 2012, when 10 customers, such as F, etc., such as the victim G, the owner of the business, and the drinking value, are heard by 10,00 customers, such as F, etc. during the time when she was viewed as having been in a view to the victim’s 10 years of this weather, and the same year as F, etc., for the remaining.”

2. This part of the facts charged is an offense falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon the victim's complaint under Article 312 of the same Act. Since the victim may be deemed to have withdrawn the complaint by mutual consent with the defendant after the prosecution of this case, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.