2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s confessions all the facts charged of the instant case and reflects on the facts charged.

However, considering all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, family environment, background and result of the crime of this case, even though the defendant had been suspended twice as a crime of the same kind, it is not deemed unfair because the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal of this case by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal of this case is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Provided, That it is corrected that the appeal of this case is deleted from one to three of the facts constituting the crime of the judgment