A and C shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,00.

The Defendants respectively.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal co-offenders are residents of Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Incheon, and Defendant A was the representative of Dong-gu and the president of Dong-gu, Defendant B was the representative of Dong-gu, and Defendant B was the representative of Dong-dong and the chairman of emergency countermeasures, and were in conflict with the victim F who is the chairman of the occupant representative of the above apartment and the above apartment operation, and filed various complaints, accusations and complaints with each other.

around October 6, 2014, the Defendants reported an assembly to the head of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu Police Station under the name of “Ampic Demonstration for the development of corruption”, the date and time of the assembly as “the date and time from October 9, 2014 to November 5, 2014”; the place of the assembly as “the delivery of the E apartment,” and the organizer as Defendant B; from October 9, 2014 to around September 4, 2014, more than 10 residents and the victim were sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million in the latter apartment as the crime of taking property in breach of trust at the Incheon District Court on the following apartment; and held the assembly by attaching the judgment thereto on a sign.

From October 30, 2014 to November 14, 2014, the Defendants held an assembly in front of the foregoing apartment complex from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. annually. Defendant A and Defendant C participated in the bidding without receiving a bid deposit from the successful bidder in the process of selecting the security service company in March 2012. Since the contract was reversed, even though the relevant company submitted the forged document, the contract was reversed, it was not later charged with the charge of taking property in breach of trust.

'' informed the purport to the effect that the articles of the H ‘H', which was reported on the Gyeonggi Japan newsletter on October 22, 2014, were expanded, printed out, and attached and posted on the diskettes so that many unspecified people can be seen.

However, the Defendants informed the reporters of the fact.