(a) Project approval and announcement 1): The public announcement of public housing project ( Q district 2): The defendant; the defendant; the project operator of R, etc. announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 16, 201;

B. In the adjudication of expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on June 25, 2015, the part concerning this case among the adjudication of expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on June 25, 2015: Land and obstacles listed in the attached Table 2, which are owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “instant land and obstacles”).

(2) Compensation date: Compensation for losses on August 18, 2015: as indicated in the item column for the valuation of expropriation decision in the attached Table 3: Provided, That with respect to the part of obstacles owned by the Plaintiff N, the above Plaintiffs did not claim an increase in the application for the change of claim and the cause of claim as of August 11, 2016, this part is not stated; hereinafter the same shall apply) since the above Plaintiffs did not claim an increase in the application for the change of claim and the cause of claim as of August 11, 2016: An appraisal corporation in the country of Korea, one appraisal corporation, one appraisal corporation.

C. The content of the adjudication by the Central Land Tribunal on November 19, 2015 (part 1 concerning this case among the adjudications by objection): An appraisal corporation: The same as indicated in the item column of the evaluation amount of the objection in the attached Table 3: The Korea Land Tribunal: the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, and the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter the above appraisers collectively referred to as “appraisals,” and the amount of compensation calculated by taking an arithmetic mean of the results of the appraisal (hereinafter “adjudication”).

D. 1) Compensation for losses as a result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal: An appraisal corporation of a stock company (hereinafter referred to as “court appraisal”) in attached Form 3: The fact that there is no dispute over the result of appraisal by the appraisal corporation of the stock company (hereinafter referred to as “court appraisal”), the entry of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal by the appraisal corporation of the stock company, the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion and appraisal are based on the selection of compensation precedents with low comparabilityability in calculating other factors correction values, etc., and land of this case.