토지인도
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for adding the following judgments to the "use" of the first instance judgment No. 5 of the first instance court's decision, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance court's decision. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The decision to add [The non-permanent warehouse and house built by the Defendant on the land in this case appears to be relatively easy to separate and remove them, and thus, the cost required for restoration to its original state would not be significant. Furthermore, since the warehouse and house composed of the above warehouse are deemed to be reusable, it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s waiver of the right to purchase the above warehouse and house may cause a big socioeconomic loss to the Defendant or the individual.]
3. The plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.