자동차운전면허취소처분취소
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Details of the disposition
On June 3, 2020, around 22:27, 2020, the Plaintiff driven Cpoer car volume while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.106% on the front of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (B).
(2) On June 12, 2020, the Defendant issued a disposition to revoke the Plaintiff’s driver’s license (Class 2 common) on the ground of the instant drunk driving.
(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on August 19, 2020, but was dismissed on September 22, 2020.
[Reasons for Recognition] In light of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3-1, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 1 through 8, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the judgment of the court below was unlawful since it exceeded the scope of discretionary authority and abused the disposition of this case, in light of the following: the plaintiff's act of driving under the influence of alcohol was reported; the plaintiff did not have any history of driving under the influence of alcohol; the plaintiff's work in a construction company as a worker; the plaintiff has been in office in a construction company as a worker and has been in office, so it is necessary for a driver's license to move the construction site; the driving is an important means to maintain the family's livelihood; and the plaintiff faces economic difficulties.
Judgment
Today, in light of the fact that there is a growing need to strictly observe traffic regulations in accordance with the reduction of traffic conditions due to the rapid increase of automobiles, the large number of driver's licenses are issued, and the traffic accidents due to driving by driving by driving by driving by driving by driving frequently and there are many cases where the results are harsh, so it is necessary to strictly regulate driving by driving by driving, it is more necessary to realize public interest rather than disadvantages suffered by driving drivers who do not cause traffic accidents due to the cancellation disposition of driver's license. < Amended by Act No. 515, Oct. 11, 1996>