If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a driver of Sti Sti, Sti, Oral, Stiba.

On March 5, 2013, at around 09:50 on March 5, 2013, the Defendant proceeded in front of the decentralization distance from the northwest Middle School at the northwest Office in one way.

The location had a duty of care to safely proceed to a person engaged in driving service on a road with a signal apparatus in the front line.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant got off the bicycle of the victim C(79 years old) who operated the crosswalk on the pedestrian signal to the left-hand side from the 5rd side of the vice zone, which is the right-hand side of the vehicle of the Defendant, due to the negligence of driving the bicycle on the pedestrian signal.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C by the occupational negligence as above, such as a bruption of the brush of the brush of the part in need of approximately eight weeks of treatment, and pressure 2 of the closed brush of the brush.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a traffic accident report and a traffic accident actual investigation report;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.