가. 별지 제1항 기재 부동산 중 별지 제2항 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠의...

가. 원고는 2017. 6. 27. 피고에게 원고 소유인 별지 제1항 기재 부동산 중 별지 제2항 도면 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉠의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 사무소 부분 66.5㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 상가’라고 한다)를 임대차보증금 5,000,000원, 차임 월 600,000원(매월 10일 선불), 임대기간 2017. 7. 10.부터 2019. 7. 9.까지로 정하여 임대하면서, 피고가 차임을 3기 이상 연체한 경우 이 사건 임대차계약을 해지할 수 있다고 약정하였다

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

The Defendant paid KRW 5,00,000 to the Plaintiff and paid the rent to June 10, 2018 while operating an authorized brokerage office in the instant commercial building, but began to delay the rent from July 10, 2018.

If the Plaintiff did not pay the Defendant the overdue rent to the Defendant by December 10, 2018 during the three-year period, the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease on the ground of the Defendant’s overdue rent, if he did not pay the overdue rent to the Defendant by December 10, 2018.

The defendant did not pay the difference in arrears until December 10, 2018.

C. The defendant is operating a certified brokerage office in the commercial building of this case until the date of the closing of argument and uses and profits therefrom.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 4 (including tentative number), the purport of whole pleading

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the instant lease agreement was lawfully terminated on or around December 10, 2018 on the grounds of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant commercial building to the Plaintiff due to the restitution following the termination of the lease agreement.

In addition, from July 10, 2018 to March 10, 2019 to the Plaintiff, the Defendant totaling KRW 5,400,000 (=60,000 x 9 months) from the lease deposit of this case from KRW 5,00,00.