As to the real estate indicated in the list (hereinafter “instant real estate”), the Plaintiff’s share 2/5, and the Defendant owned each share 3/5, and the Defendant was served with a complaint seeking the auction division of the instant real estate and did not give any answer as to the method of partition of co-owned property, taking into account the fact that there is no special circumstance to consider the method of partition, not the auction division, according to the method of partition of the instant real estate.