2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8976, Feb. 21, 2008; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; and the defendant was notified of the summary order subject to review

On July 30, 2009, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that "if an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence provided for in Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine provided for in Article 83 (1) of the former Road Act shall also be imposed on the corporation in violation of the Constitution (the Constitutional Court Order 2008HunGa17, July 30, 2009)" and accordingly, Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act retroactively loses its effect pursuant to the proviso to Article 47 (2) of the same Act.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.