A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of one thousand won.

[2015 Height5655]

1. Defendant A and B

A. From September 22, 2014 to June 21, 2015, Defendant A operated a commercial sex business establishment with the trade name “I” as “Htel 317, 729, 1416, 1920, 1314, and 2314, from around September 2014 to June 21, 2015. From around June 22, 2015 to around August 11, 2015, Defendant A provided that Defendant B, who acquired the said commercial sex business establishment, received some of the business profits from the business, and provided advice on the method of controlling and controlling the women of commercial sex acts, etc.

Defendant

B operated the said sexual traffic business from June 22, 2015 to August 11, 2015, and performed the work of managing women's sexual traffic and business profits.

J from May 2015 to August 11, 2015, and from May 2015 to July 25, 2015, K (Co-Defendant 2 prior to separation) worked as an employee of the said sexual traffic business establishment respectively, and decided to undergo an investigation instead of a verification of unemployment at the time of crackdown, while guiding and regulating the male sexual traffic at the place of sexual traffic.

B. The facts constituting the crime, Defendant A, and B provided guidance to the head of the above officetel 1920 so that they may receive 130,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from L who found the above sexual traffic business establishment on July 25, 2015 and engage in sexual intercourse with C, a female sexual traffic, as well as Defendant A, on October 12, 2014; Defendant A, Defendant A, K, and J, for the same year.

5.26.26. The same year

6.3. The defendant A, B, and J are the same year.

7. 17. The defendants A, B and J shall be the same year.

8.4.For the same year

8. 11. The above method allowed a man who found sexual traffic establishments to receive sexual traffic payments from the male who found sexual traffic establishments, and sexual intercourse with the female sexual traffic.

As a result, Defendant A and B in collusion with K and J, respectively, set forth in Section 1 of the above Article.

For the same period as described in the port, sexual traffic mediation was conducted for business purposes.

2. Defendant C: (a) on July 25, 2015, the instant officetel 1920; and (b) on commercial sex acts business establishments.