대여금
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 90,000,000 and the interest rate thereon from March 22, 2016 to the date of full payment.
1. On June 30, 2005, the Plaintiff lent KRW 90 million to the Defendants. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff the interest on the principal from July 30, 2006 to July 30, 2007 (2.5 or 3.0 copies). The fact that the Plaintiff agreed to pay the principal in full at the agreed maturity does not conflict between the parties, or that the Plaintiff agreed to pay the principal in full at the agreed maturity, may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as stated in the evidence No. 1.
Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from March 22, 2016 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the day when the duplicate of the instant complaint was served on the Defendants, as requested by the Plaintiff.
2. As to the judgment on Defendant C’s defense, Defendant C asserted that the Plaintiff’s loan claim has expired by prescription. Thus, according to the evidence No. 2, Defendant C may recognize the fact that on September 4, 2006, Defendant C paid the Plaintiff the interest on the loan amounting to KRW 1.8 million, and Defendant C’s defense that applied for the instant payment order on November 23, 2015, within ten years thereafter, is groundless.
3. The plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is with merit and it is so decided as per Disposition.