On August 14, 2016, the Defendant, in the vicinity of the village residing around 11:30, 2016, took water play together with E, a village resident, the same village resident, and at the same time, G, the wife of the victim F (57 years old) who was a village resident in the next valley, who was playing water in the valley, was in the reputation where the Defendant and E are about to move back the sublime.

Although the Defendant rejected the request by G by explaining that the Defendant’s dog was unwritten and asked the Defendant to open the dog, the Defendant continued to undergo the same request from G, the Defendant sent a bath to G, followed G, followed the Defendant’s humping, followed the Defendant’s breath, followed the Defendant’s bomb, and dumped up the bus.

Therefore, the defendant, which is a dangerous object that he had used by E at the next two parts, has ever come back one time on the part of the victim's clean pan, and let the victim flow hot oil into the left part of the damaged person.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things with the victim's shoulder and 2 degrees of arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and E;

1. Application of medical certificates and related photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. It does not seem that the degree of injury of the victim for the reason of sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of amount of punishment is serious. When the victim met her bomb and bomb, he committed the crime in this case. The defendant did not have a criminal record, but he did not reflect the defendant's denial of the fact of the crime; the defendant did not receive a bomb from the victim; the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, occupation, family relation; and the defendant's age, sex, occupation, family relation.