When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who has no fixed occupation.

피고인은 2017. 1. 23. 11:30 경 부산시 강서구 명지동에 있는 부산 강서 경찰서 민원실에서, ‘ 피 진정인 B가 2016. 10. 경 부산시 해운대구 C 건물에 있는 진정 인의 주거지 식탁에서 알 렉산 더 맥 퀸 선글라스 1개 시가 80만 원 상당을 가져 가 절도하였다’ 는 취지의 진정서를 작성하여 그 곳에 있는 성명 불상의 직원에게 제출하고, 같은 날 13:58 경 부산 강서 경찰서 수사과 D 팀 소속 순경 E에게 같은 취지로 보충 진술을 하였으며, 계속하여 2017. 2. 15. 부산시 부 전로에 있는 부산진 경찰서 형사과 F 팀 사무실에서, 위 F 팀 소속 경사 G에게도 같은 취지로 진술하였다.

However, the facts are as follows: the Defendant, around May 2016, sent to B the above glass for the purpose of exchanging the glass of B with the view to exchanging the glass of B, so the above Defendant’s petition and supplementary statements were all false statements.

In this respect, the defendant had not been punished against B for the purpose of having B receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer under B;

1. Statement made by the police against the defendant;

1. A written petition;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (one month between 7 and 9);

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of a selective fine (the initial crime is the one, and the depth of the crime is reflected);

1. Articles 157 and 153 of the Criminal Act to mitigate confessions;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;