However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 8, 2016, around 19:30 on July 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was melted by the Defendant in the victim C’s Mat in the management of the victim C, Inc., and thus, was rejected; (b) was changed in the course of the entry of the Defendant, and was in the display belt.

20kg tried to take rice booms and take a bath to employees, etc., thereby obstructing the operation of 40 minutes of a victim's mags by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Investigation report (to make a witness E telephone conversations) (the defendant is drunk at the time of committing the instant crime and is unable to memory;

I asserts to the effect that the state of mental disorder was in a state of mental disorder.

According to the records, even though the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, in light of the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the details of the crime, the attitude of the defendant, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, etc., it is not recognized that the defendant was under the influence of alcohol, or did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions,

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime (the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the following favorable circumstances):

1. Reasons for sentencing [the scope of recommendation] under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Education, Article 59 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Users [the scope of punishment] [1-8 months] under the mitigation area (a person with special mitigation] [a person with special mitigation] under the punishment [a person with sentence] under the defendant's criminal records of being punished for the same kind of crime, even though the defendant was under the influence of alcohol, the crime is not less and less likely to obstruct the business of D marina used by many customers.

The instant crime was committed under the influence of alcohol, and such circumstances are no longer favorable to the circumstances.

However, the defendant recognized his mistake and is in profoundly against himself.

In agreement with the victim, the injured person does not want to punish the accused.