성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 4, 2016, the Defendant agreed to engage in commercial sex acts to the effect that, while dialogueing in D and “C” hosting windows, the Defendant came to know of “C” by means of a smartphone hosting c, “C” around 18:20 on October 4, 2016, the Defendant agreed to receive KRW 120,000 won at one time in sexual intercourse D.
After that, the Defendant met D at “Fel” located in Gwangju Northern-gu, 19:30 on the same day and received KRW 1.20,000 from D and received delivery of KRW 120,00 from D.
Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.
2. On October 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) ordered the pro-Japanese Police Station G to report to the effect that “The Defendant voluntarily withdrawn the money after assaulting and injuring the Defendant; (b) he/she shall be punished.”
After that, on October 4, 2016, the Defendant appeared at the police station of the Gwangju Northern District, located in Gwangju Northern District, and stated to the effect that “A police officer, who received KRW 120,00,00 from D around October 4, 2016, had a male intercourse with D only on the conditions, and D, after having sexual intercourse with D, had the right shoulder at the right shoulder of drinking, she had the fright to walk back again, and had the police officer deducted 120,000 won by threatening him/her to pay the money, so he/she could be punished.”
However, even though the Defendant did not face the shoulder from D or walk the clothes, and was threatened with 120,000 won, while engaging in sexual intercourse with D, the Defendant did not comply with the conditions, and filed a false report with the police, on the fact that he was unable to stop sexual intercourse in the middle and returned KRW 120,000 to him.
Accordingly, the defendant had D without the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each statement made to the defendant by the prosecution concerning the suspect interrogation protocol;
1. In regard to D, each protocol concerning the examination of suspects by the prosecution;