특수절도등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
The Defendants shall be exempted from punishment.
1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the sentence against the Defendants of the lower court (three months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below was made on July 5, 2012 by the following facts: (a) the Act on the Acceptance of Criminal Crimes was professional and interviewed; (b) the victims’ damage was not recovered to the trial; (c) the Defendants had been punished for the same kind of crime; and (d) the Defendants committed the crime of this case without being aware of during the period of repeated crime; (b) the Defendants were in depth divided into the Defendants; (c) on April 18, 2012, the Defendants were sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc.; (d) the Defendants were sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months; and (e) the Defendants were sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months; and (e) on December 1, 2012, the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive on December 1, 2012 by taking into account the following facts: (e) the special larceny, etc., the credit card company and the Defendant’s driver’s license were sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for each of this case; and (e.) the judgment of this case’s special larceny.
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act as the defendants' appeal is well-grounded, and the following decision is rendered after pleading.
Criminal facts
Criminal facts recognized by this court as well as summary of the evidence are stated in the corresponding columns of the original judgment.