When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 4, 2020, at around 22:20 on September 4, 2020, the Defendant was able to find out the victim C (name, name) prior to India of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was able to commit an indecent act against the victim. On the back of the victim, the Defendant was able to find out the victim C (name, name) and the victim was able to commit an indecent act against the victim, and the victim was her her ket with the victim’s own hand, with the victim’s her t

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's partial statement C (a name)'s legal statement investigation report (booms image submitted by a male-friendly Gu of the victim) (the defendant and his defense counsel are limited to a narrow delivery, and the defendant and his defense counsel do not commit an indecent act because they seem to face the victim and the shoulder, and they do not seem to have committed an indecent act.

However, the victim has consistently made statements on the major parts of the facts in the ruling from the investigative agency to the court of law, including the situation before and after the prosecution, the part and method of the prosecution (in the case of the hand floor, referring to the 'compret'), the emotional shoter, the process of informing the male-gu of the damage and reporting it to the 112.

In video recording in the situation at the time, it is confirmed that the victim gets her body by the edge of the victim that the defendant goes up by going up by the victim's side, and that the male-friendly her body was stopped, supporting the credibility of the victim's statement. The above victim's appearance does not seem to be seen as a reaction that is visible in a sudden situation where her scam and shoulder face, and it is difficult for the victim to find any motive or reason that the victim first gets off the defendant on the day of the instant case.

Rather, the Defendant was faced with the victim who had drinking with the police officer first called up and had the shouldered.

The statement (this is also confirmed in the recording file listened to at the time of the examination of the accused) and the police investigation into the suspect.