2. The judgment of the court below is against all the defendant's confessions of the crime, but the defendant has many records of punishment for the same kind of crime even before the crime in this case. The defendant committed the crime in this case during the repeated crime period due to the same crime, committed the crime in many unspecified restaurants for the purpose of amusement, such as drinking, repeatedly over a considerable period of time in many unspecified restaurants, and committed the crime such as fraud, public conflict, theft, etc., and also committed a very poor crime by abusing those who were taken advantage of those who were taken in prison in the past, and did not make a repayment of damage without agreement with the victims even before the trial, taking into account all the circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the circumstance and contents leading to the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the sentence of the court below is unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.