If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. From around 08:00 on July 14, 2012 to 08:30 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s marina business by force by force by preventing the customers who had been suffering from a disturbance under the influence of alcohol from entering the mail business by leaving the victim’s employees F, on the ground that the Defendant got the victim’s infant E at around 01:00 on the same day within the D convenience store operated by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C. of the same year.

2. From 12:00 to 13:20 on the same day, the Defendant re-exploited in a marina in the said place for the foregoing reasons at the same time, and prevented the victim from entering the said place by avoiding the disturbance “Astrest, Astrest, B,” thereby obstructing the victim’s marina business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;