2. The judgment of the court below contains some favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the confession of all criminal facts and the fact that the defendant made a confession of all of the criminal facts of this case, the degree of injury of the victim due to the crime of escape after the injury by occupational negligence of this case is not severe, the defendant has a family member to support at present, and the defendant is faced with a situation where he loses his workplace, but there are not yet agreed with the victim. There are not only the records that the defendant was punished as the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes even before, but also four times or more, the defendant has been punished as the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and each of the crimes of this case is committed for a repeated crime and it is impossible to sentence a suspended sentence if the defendant choose to punish the defendant, and there are other unfavorable circumstances, such as the motive, means and result of each crime of this case, the situation, age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment of the defendant, etc., the above argument by the court below cannot be justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.