If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 24, 2017, at around 21:59, the Defendant assaulted upon the Defendant’s residence in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, C5 Dong 101, and on the ground that the police box affiliated with the Incheon Samsan Police Station D, which was called out after having received a report to the effect that “a male strings a door and a female strings a door,” and the circumstances leading up to the police box belonging to the Incheon Samsan Police Station D, which was called out, changed the entrance by opening the entrance.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a police officer, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning E crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable condition: The defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake.

There is no record of punishment for the defendant since 1997, and there is no record of punishment for interference with the execution of official duties in the past.

It is necessary to strictly punish police officers with respect to their actions that interfere with the performance of official duties.