beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.30 2014고합555

배임증재

Text

Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant D shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

A, B, and C above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C On November 11, 2009, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution for embezzlement, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 13, 2010.

Defendant

A is the representative director of P (hereinafter referred to as the "P") and Defendant B is the representative director of Q Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "P"), Defendant C is the hub for building permit, Defendant D is the Seoul Industrial University (Seoul National Institute of Science and Technology) R and teaching staff, and Defendant D was designated as a Gyeonggi-do T member with regard to the permission for the new construction of the main complex building on the lots of Suwon-gu S and 7 lots (hereinafter referred to as the "instant building") around December 2009, which is implemented in Q from the Seoul National University (Seoul National University of Science and Technology), and is a person who has the duty to deliberate, examine, examine, and present problems and alternatives for the stability of the structure of reinforced concrete in the construction design at the time of a prior deliberation on the building permit.

1. Defendant A, B, and C entered into a service contract with respect to the building design and permission of the instant building implemented in Q. On May 29, 2009, Defendant A submitted an application for the building permission of the instant building to the Suwon Broadcasting Board on or around December 8, 2009, Defendant A agreed to grant money and valuables to Defendant C by offering offering offering money and valuables to Defendant B while discussing the measures with Defendant B, along with Defendant B and C on December 27, 2009, under the circumstance that the Suwon Joint Commission (Urban Planning, Building) obtained conditional approval on or around December 8, 2009, and continued to obtain the permission prior approval of the building permission of Gyeonggi-do, which is the higher authority, in Gyeonggi-do T members of the Gyeonggi-do T-do Committee, with the result of the prior review by the Gyeonggi-do T-do Committee on December 29, 2009. < Amended by Act No. 9827, Dec. 27, 2009>

Accordingly, Defendant A and C also P. around December 29, 2009.