However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 24, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Western District Court on July 24, 2013, and on September 11, 2014, the Daejeon District Court issued a summary order of two million won or more for the same crime.

On December 18, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle Enboo in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of 0.185% on the roads of D brokerage offices located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.185%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on the driving of alcohol and reports on the detection of drivers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (the fact that a person has been punished twice or more due to drinking, but was found to have committed a second offense in the state of drinking alcohol concentration of 0.185% in blood, is disadvantageous, confession and reflective, and there is no heavy criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and there is no heavy accident, and the fact that a person has been disposing of a motor vehicle, and is taking advantage of a bicycle, etc. into consideration favorable circumstances);

1. Order to attend lectures or order to provide community service under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;