However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 1:55 on July 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) discovered the said vehicle from the victim C (34 years old), a South Korean living together with the victim D (28 years old), while driving the said vehicle at the YE-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), around 11:55, the Defendant: (b) discovered the vehicle from the victim, who was living together with the victim (34 years old) and the victim D (28 years old), and demanded a stop; (c) on the ground that the victims would not stop the vehicle; (d) around the 12:36th day of the same day, the Defendant concealed the vehicle from the front part of the vehicle boarding the victim with the front part of the vehicle, and caused damage to the victim, such as repair expenses, 4,530,00 won, and treatment of the vehicle from the front part of the vehicle, to the right part of the victim, and (d) 2:2,000,000 for the victim during the day.

Accordingly, the defendant, using a dangerous article, inflicted each injury on the victims, and damaged the property owned by the victim C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. A written statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Photographs (scamboxe editing photographs);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Written estimate;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the attachment of a victim C vehicle black photo, the attachment of a certificate of insurance coverage for suspect C vehicle driving vehicles and a compensation therefor, hearing of the victim F statement, the submission of a estimate for the victim C and F damaged vehicle, and the attachment of a lock box for the victim C vehicle c vehicle);

1. Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury) and 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the punishment prescribed for the special injury of a victim C, the crimes of which are heavier between each of the special injury crimes as indicated in the judgment, and the punishment prescribed for the special injury of a victim C, of which the punishment is heavier);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of destroying special property in choice of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.