추심금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) evidence additionally submitted in the trial and lack of recognition of the defendant’s assertion, Eul evidence Nos. 15 and 16, which is insufficient to accept the defendant’s assertion; and (b) the defendant’s new argument in the trial is the same as the part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, (c) it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4
2. The Defendant asserted that the construction cost for the Dong and Dong of the instant officetel was later late than the construction cost for the Dong and Dong, among the instant officetels, for the reasons such as delay of construction work and defects, etc. in the above A Dong and B.
However, in light of the consistent circumstances such as that the defendant's assertion related to the process of payment of construction price changes from time to time, the defendant's assertion that the above circumstances alleged by the defendant occurred, and the defendant's assertion that the construction price for the officetel C Dong of this case was first paid cannot be accepted.
3. If so, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.