2. We examine the judgment, although the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case even though he had the record of juvenile protective disposition or criminal punishment several times, and the defendant again committed the crimes of this case on the ground that the defendant's Kakao Stockholm message sent by the victim E was bad, and the defendant called E during night, because he refused it, and the defendant assaulted the victim F to the victim F, thereby causing the victim's injury, such as bad motive and method. The defendant committed the crime of driver without driver's license, even though there were several records of punishment for driving without driver's license, it is appropriate to punish the court below, taking into account the defendant's age, career, sexual behavior, the circumstances of each of the crimes of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, and all of the judgment of the court below as stated in the arguments and records.

The defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.