국유재산법위반등
All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.
1. In full view of all the sentencing conditions stated in the arguments of this case including the defendant's age, character and conduct, health, home environment, the background, method and result of the crime, etc., when considering the favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant acknowledged the crime of unfair sentencing, the fact that the blood alcohol content of the violation of the Road Traffic Act belongs to a relatively low level, and the defendant has been punished several times for the same and different crimes, and the defendant has been punished several times for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) in 2012. The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 4 months for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2012 and continuously committed the act of non-license or drunk driving of this case during the period of repeated crime, and other unfavorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, the circumstance and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.
2. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.