2. The judgment of the court of first instance does not seem to have a significant impact on the conclusion of the case, such as violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, etc., and the fact that the crime of perjury in this case was deposited in the court for E more than 10 million won, etc. However, each of the crimes in this case was committed in a way that it interferes with and disturbs the court's examination for finding substantial truth and the appropriate exercise of the State's penal authority. The crime in this case was committed in the first instance and the criminal trial in the first instance was conducted on suspicion of violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, etc., at the time when approximately 5 months have been detained for E, and accordingly, it appears that E had suffered serious mental and physical pain, and the defendant was paid KRW 25 million under the name of criminal agreement from E at the time of the criminal trial in the first instance trial in the first instance, and it is not recognized that the defendant's age, character and behavior, circumstances, motive and means of the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the pleading are too unfair.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, since the application of the law in the judgment of the court below is obvious that the "paragraph (1) (U.S.)" in the second sentence is a clerical error in the "paragraph (1)", it shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure to "paragraph (1) (the point of perjury)."