2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime, and agreed with, or recovered from, the victim, but even though the Defendant was punished several times due to the same kind of crime, it is not likely that the instant crime by deceiving high-priced alcoholic beverages under the same veterinary method only for one month after the completion of the execution of the same crime, even though the Defendant was punished several times for the same crime.

In addition, given that the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, occupation, family relationship, and family circumstances, the motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is groundless.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.