From March 1997 to July 2019, the Defendant came to know of the victim D while working as the radiation line and office at C Hospital located in the Crossing-gun B of Gangwon-do. The Defendant received money from the victim in the name of the borrowed money for purchasing a medical device from the victim and received money from the victim to use it for his/her own stock investment, personal debt repayment, etc.

1. Whether the Defendant, in relation to the purchase of a medical device, could provide the victim with funds to purchase the medical device at the radiation department office and office office of the above C Hospital around August 2016

This shall be in note.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had a total of KRW 678,729,00 with respect to financial institutions, etc., and had the intention to repay the individual debt with the loan or to use it as a stock investment, etc. from the beginning, and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the loan normally even if the Defendant received the loan from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim and then transferred KRW 100,000,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) in the name of the defendant from the victim on August 11, 2016, as the loan money from the victim on or around August 11, 2016, and the list of crimes in attached Form.

1. A total of KRW 170,000,000 was remitted on three occasions from around that time to August 25, 2016, as indicated in the statement.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 2017, the Defendant, in relation to the payment of the construction work, calls from the victim at the adjoining land and calls the victim for “Ambrying construction work,” and the construction cost is insufficient.

One month shall be repaid immediately if it is lent to one month.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any person who is aware of the construction business, and had the intention to pay the individual debt with the loan or to use it as a stock investment, etc., so there was no intention or ability to pay the loan normally even if the Defendant received the loan from the injured party.

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.