2. It is recognized that the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and reflected in the judgment, that the defendant resulted in the crime of this case in order to raise the living cost in an infinite growth environment, that the defendant's profits derived from the crime of this case are not much high, that the finite mother, who was finite, wishes to live together with the defendant in the future in order to protect the defendant's livelihood, and that he want to live together with the defendant in the future.

However, even in around 2015, the Defendant: (a) actively aided and abetted the instant Bosing crime; (b) the Defendant’s maximum amount of money collected by the Defendant for the organization of Bosing criminal acts exceeds KRW 190 million; (c) the victims could not recover from damage in light of the economic situation of the Defendant; and (d) other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments and records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too appropriate and too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.