2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant led to the crime of this case, the profit gained by the defendant was only KRW 300,000,00, and the defendant was extremely difficult to economic situation as a basic recipient of daily life. However, it is necessary to respect the judgment of the court below because there is no change in sentencing conditions compared to the court below since new sentencing data have not been submitted at the court below. Although the defendant had been punished several times due to the theft of the same law, there is a high risk of repeating the crime of this case repeatedly, the defendant committed the larceny crime of this case, committed the crime of this case, which was committed on April 30, 201, which was committed while the appellate court was sentenced to a fine on April 30, 201 and continued to have an interview during the period of repeated offense, and did not agree with the victim, and other circumstances, such as the circumstance and result of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's character and behavior, environment, age, etc., as well as various circumstances in the records and arguments in this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.