beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.12 2017고단4829 (1)

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[criminal history] On May 23, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two-year imprisonment on August 23, 2017 by intrusion upon a structure at night, larceny, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 31, 2017.

[2] Criminal facts C and D are employees of the “E used cars trading company” in Seo-gu Incheon, and the Defendant decided to purchase used cars through C and D.

Defendant, C, and D knew that it is difficult for the Defendant to borrow loans due to lack of a certain occupation at the time, and deceptioned the lending company to obtain loans in the name of the Defendant by forging documents evidencing the Defendant’s employment.

1. In around March 9, 2016, the Defendant, C, and D forged private documents: (a) around the instant used cars trading market near the above used cars market; (b) D gave a person under the name of the deceased to a KRW 300,000 in cash; and (c) requested the Defendant to forge the documents related to the employment of the Defendant; (b) the person under the name of the deceased was named as “A” in the name column; (c) on September 7, 2015 in the resident registration number column; (d) “F” in the resident registration number column; (d) “F” in the position column; and (e) “F” in the current address column; and (e) “production book” in the work division column and “the production book” as of September 7, 2015 to March 9, 2016; and (e) “the submission of the name “H” in the column, “the location of the Plaintiff’s phone number” in the column and “H” in the column.

As a result, the defendant, C, and D forged a letter of commission contract certification for the defendant under H, a private document related to rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering.

2. In the vicinity of the above place on March 9, 2016, the Defendant, C, and D’s event of the above investigation document, as if he conspired and conspired, were to have the burden of proving the forged commission contract, by facsimile, to employees in the name of the subordinate branch office of Samsung C&M Co., Ltd., Ltd., which knew of the forgery.