2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. B, on August 22, 1967, was appointed as a local construction technician, and worked in the same City D, E, etc., as the beginning of the appointment of the local construction supervisor for the local construction and working in the Gyeong-si, Ulsan-do, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

B was promoted to a local architectural engineer on July 5, 1975 through a local architectural engineer, a local architectural engineer, etc. from April 1, 1978, and served as D and F in Ulsan City Construction Bureau from April 1, 1978.

5. From February 1, 1979, work for the same department G, and work for F again from February 1, 1979.

The disciplinary action against the local construction engineer B shall be decided by reprimand pursuant to Article 69 (1) 1 and 2 of the Local Public Officials Act.

Reasons

1. The grounds for a request for a disciplinary decision are as follows: (a) a local construction engineer B worked as D and F (G) from April 1, 197 to September 1, 197; (b) constructed 11,149.25 square meters in the area of a building permit for H middle school on September 19, 197, but neglected construction exceeding 685.4 square meters in an unjust manner; and (c) did not regulate an apartment that was used without the approval procedure (hereinafter “the first ground for disciplinary decision”); and (d) on November 1, 1977, it was impossible to approve the approval as the grounds for disciplinary action (hereinafter “the first ground for disciplinary action”).

2. In light of the fact that the construction permission work is divided in the building community and the interim and completion inspection is carried out in the facility system and the regulation of unauthorized buildings is divided in the facility system, it is considered subject to the regulation of household use prior to the permission.

3. Accordingly, the above conduct violated the duty of good faith under Article 48 of the Local Public Officials Act, and the decision is made as ordered with the misconduct falling under Article 69 (1) 1 and 2 of the Local Public Officials Act.

(b).