2. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 1,200,000 and this out.

A. On December 206, 2006, the Plaintiff (former Mutual Savings Bank, the Defendant (former Mutual Savings Bank, Korea Mutual Savings Bank, Korea Mutual Savings Bank, Defendant (former Mutual Savings Bank, Korea Mutual Savings Bank, Scar Savings Bank, Korea Stock Company, Switzerland Mutual Savings Bank (former Mutual Savings Bank, scar Savings Bank, Korea Stock Company, and Korea Mutual Savings Bank), Korea Native Savings Bank, Ltd., Ltd., KIKO Savings Bank (former Mutual Savings Bank prior to the change), 11 financial institutions (hereinafter, “one financial institutions”) including the Plaintiff (former Mutual Savings Bank, Korea Mutual Savings Bank, Korea Mutual Savings Bank, and Korea Mutual Savings Bank, etc., prior to the change), were to form a single loan agreement with a large number of financial institutions under the condition that loans will be made up of 25 million won and 00,00,00,00 and 111% of the loan interest rate to the lender (former Mutual Savings Bank, Korea Mutual Savings Bank, and so on).

C concluded a real estate security trust agreement with a trust company, which is the trust company as the truster, the trust company as the trustee, and the lender as the first priority beneficiary, in order to secure the loan obligations to the lender of this case, and then deliver the certificate of beneficial rights to the lender. Each lender set up a pledge against C’s deposit account (Account Number D) with the maximum debt amount of KRW 32,50,000,000 (1.3 times of the secured debt) for each lender, and Nonparty E jointly and severally guaranteed all obligations under the loan agreement of this case.

At that time, the lender may follow the above agreement.