beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.07.27 2012고단1126

변호사법위반

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged and the defendant's assertion

A. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the defendant, on September 15, 2007, was promoting the business of manufacturing and selling beverages with hydrogen added at the F Office of the Korea Food and Drug Administration, which was operated by the F Office of the F Office of the corporation operated by the Busan Young-gu, Busan in order to revise the notification of the Korea Food and Drug Administration so that it is possible to manufacture and sell beverages with hydrogen added, it is necessary to add 50,000 won to the public officials in charge of the Korea Food and Drug Administration and 10 members of the Food Sanitation Deliberation Committee, and later, when the Deliberation Committee is opened at the same place on January 11, 2008, the defendant received money and valuables or other valuables under the name of the public official who received the request from the E on November 11, 2008 to transfer 50,000,000 won to E.

B. On September 15, 2007, the defendant asserted that he provided consulting services on the revision of the notification of the Korea Food and Drug Administration to manufacture and sell beverages with hydrogen added with F Co., Ltd., and entered into a contract with the Commissioner of the Korea Food and Drug Administration to receive KRW 120,000,000,000. After that, as the defendant completed the above service, he did not receive all service payments including KRW 50,000 as stated in the facts charged, and it did not receive the above KRW 50,00,000 under the pretext of talking with E as stated in the facts charged or soliciting or arranging the case or affairs handled by public officials.

2. Determination

A. The defendant's partial statement of facts, witness E and G's each legal statement, part of the prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the defendant against the defendant (including part of the E's statement) and the prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the defendant against H.