However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A

A. On June 1, 2015, the Defendant was driving a D truck under the influence of alcohol level of 0.179% in alcohol level from the front of the senior citizens’ community center at the entrance of Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do to the front of the Defendant’s house located in the same Ri from June 1, 2015.

B. On June 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was driving a vehicle at the angle of arms located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-nam, Chungcheongnam-do on June 2, 2015; and (b) was driving a vehicle to the same village resident B, who is a resident of the same village, in order to conceal the same drinking operation as described in the foregoing paragraph (A

By asking for statements, B made a false statement in mind.

Therefore, the Defendant driven the freight vehicle to B to B by the transportation survey team of the police station that was granted to B on August 11, 2015, 14:13, the 4th Sung-nam, Chungcheongnam-do, the Sung-dong, the Sung-dong, the U.S. police station that was found to have been investigating the Defendant's drinking driving.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

As a result, the defendant instigated the above B to escape a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. On August 11, 2015, at around 14:13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was asked to the police station traffic survey at the end of the Dong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; and (b) even if the Defendant did not drive a D truck at the front of the house A located in the same Ri from the elderly community center at the entrance of, and around June 1, 2015, at around 23:27, around June 1, 2015, the Defendant was asked to the F who was investigating the case of drinking driving of the said cargo at the time; and (c) was able to ask the said F of the fact that the Defendant driven the said cargo at the time; and (d) in accordance with the above teachers of,

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

As a result, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, had the above A escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police in relation to B and G;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of alcohol and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the report on the circumstances of drivers;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;